Various short-lived organizations of anthropologists had already been formed. Its members were primarily anti-slavery activists. Meanwhile, the Ethnological Society of New York, currently the American Ethnological Societywas founded on its model inas well as the Ethnological Society of London ina break-away group of the Aborigines' Protection Society.
October 11, at Various articles mention other universities. Were the anthropologists from those universities required to submit their research plans to the local IRB?
This is a very basic question that to my knowledge remains unanswered. I am going to send an email to Ms.
McFate herself requesting clarification. October 11, at 6: This is not just any US military. This is a US military whose commander in chief has done his utmost to desecrate the idea that the USA is a nation of laws, not men.
This is an illegal war, infested with Blackwater and other mercenaries. Again, I think Anthropology has something to offer here to ameliorating this disaster, but NOT as employees of the military and thus, people in a chain of command, when the top of the chain of command is the real problem.
There are instances in which I would work with the military as an embedded anthropologist. This war, this situation, is not one of them.
We have to keep in mind here that we have a code of ethics. Does this work fit in with following the code of ethics? If not, are we in a situation where we have to review and retool the code? And if we are going to revise the code, who gets to decide that?
It would also be good to hear some Iraqi voices. The subaltern should narrate here, and help us decide whether embedding anthropologists can save civilian lives as well as US troops lives.
These are not evil people. In fact, they are very smart, and by and large have very progressive politics. I myself have no objections to writing curricula for the military about the Middle East that gets them away from one-dimensional views and racist perceptions Patai and his ilk.
I think active lines of communication and debate between the anthropological community and the military is important.
But being embedded and on the ground along side the troops? I am really concerned and worried, though, as a US citizen and as a social scientist, about the long term social impact of the returning troops PTSD.
What is being done for these young men and women? It will sound flip to many, but I think the best way to deal with the mess in Iraq is for the US Congress to put impeachment on the table and to start criminal prosecution against those who set this evil chapter in US and Iraqi history in motion.
Being in a subject position of a link in the chain of command of this administration is an abomination in my view. The Bush-Cheney admin has done its utmost to rip apart the framework of international law built up since the end of WWII, and I for one would not be able to live with myself as a person, let alone a professional, if I felt I was complicit in this.
We are all persons first, and anthropologists second. The Code weaves the two subject positions together, and we should not set about tearing up that fabric because the military suddenly realizes it has a huge mess on its hands in Iraq. But is the answer to demonize those who work with the military?
We have to get our own house in order.As it stands now, every anthropologist has to work pretty damn hard to gain the trust and confidence of her informants.
I doubt that a few news stories about anthropologists in the military will make that much of a difference either way.
A Look Over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency [Richard Helms, William Hood, Henry A. Kissinger] on barnweddingvt.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
A Look over My Shoulder begins with President Nixon’s attempt to embroil the Central Intelligence Agency. As noted, anthropology’s work with the military over the years has been wrought with controversy.
Where do you stand on the issue regarding the use of anthropologists in intelligence gathering for the military? The involvement of anthropologists in military operations is always full of strong opinions and emotions; especially because it brings . anthropologists in intelligence gathering for the military?
Can you come up with a compelling argument based on examples given in the text, your understanding of. As noted, anthropology’s work with the military over the years has been wrought with controversy.
Where do you stand on the issue regarding the use of anthropologists in intelligence gathering for . The HTS is a program by the United States Army where anthropologists and other social scientists join combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to help military strategists in the battlefield to understand local cultures via the use of the Human Terrain Mapping (HTM).